Welcome, Guest!

Here are some external resources you may find helpful
  • Hello, Guest.

    With the recent attacks against members, and lack of care towards their mental health we have started a fundraiser to help fund the life saving charity the Samaritans. Without their support and efforts many people we know wouldn't be alive.

    If you're able to help, you can donate via our fundraiser on GoFundMe Link

    Thank you.

Virtua Fighter 4 Dreamcast....It would have been possible with enough I+D?

Xaeroxcore

Registered
Registered
Joined
Aug 22, 2019
Messages
30
Reaction score
12
Points
8
AG User Name
xaeroxcore
AG Join Date
Oct 17, 2012
Now that Force Five is finally on DC, we have the closest VF4/Tekken 4 DC Bootleg. Of course the canceled Atomiswave game, that wasn´t even meant to be a AAA title, is behind to those PS2 titles and even behind SC and DOA 2 on DC....but Force Five make some interesting tricks with lighting, backgrounds (with even 3D characters on the back), and textures....And it got me thinking about how an hypothetic VF 4 would look on DC...Did AM2 managed to do something apart from the VF4 Passport on DC? I would love play VF 4 on DC someday....May be with enough money it would have been possible on DC?
 
Last edited:

PopetherevXXVIII

Registered
Registered
Joined
Jul 9, 2019
Messages
274
Reaction score
69
Points
28
AG User Name
Godofhardcore
AG Join Date
Mar 31, 2007
That modem port might have been for more than just boradband.....
 

JackalSpat

Registered
Registered
Joined
Jun 2, 2019
Messages
7
Reaction score
4
Points
3
VF4 is a Naomi 2 game, right?
So it's effectively at least twice the rendering power of a Dreamcast with more RAM and much greater lighting/geometry capabilities.

That said, Arcade titles--especially the first titles on a new platform--aren't usually coded particularly "close to the metal", and I doubt very much that Virtua Fighter 4 uses the entirety of what the Naomi 2 was capable of.

Looking at it pragmatically, I don't think the Playstation 2 port is outside the realm of what the Dreamcast could achieve, especially when you take contemporary Dreamcast fighting games like Dead or Alive 2 or Soul Calibur into consideration.

I think a port to Dreamcast would've required some concessions with texture detail, background geometry, lighting, etc. but I bet if AM2 were given the opportunity, the differences would've probably been less apparent than even the Virtua Fighter 3 TB port.

It's truly sad to me that no Sega home console saw a commited port of Virtua Fighter after Virtua Fighter 2, and I always wonder at what amazing titles the Dreamcast would've seen had Sega managed to hold out just a couple of years more.
 

Americandad

Registered
Registered
Joined
Jun 28, 2019
Messages
97
Reaction score
42
Points
18
AG User Name
Americandad
AG Join Date
July 4, 2011
Of course a VF4 port is possible.
 

la-li-lu-le-lo

Registered
Registered
Joined
Jun 13, 2019
Messages
276
Reaction score
96
Points
28
AG User Name
la-li-lu-le-lo
AG Join Date
2-8-2006
I think there was an interview where Yu Suzuki or someone else from AM2 said that they had done preliminary work on VF4 for DC to try to determine if it was possible or not, and they were not happy with the results because they had to make too many sacrifices - so they ended up deciding not to develop it further. Then the DC was discontinued, so that removed any chances that it might ever happen.
 

MetalliC

Registered
Registered
Joined
Jun 28, 2019
Messages
51
Reaction score
50
Points
18
AG User Name
MetalliC
AG Join Date
23.04.2014
I always wonder at what amazing titles the Dreamcast would've seen had Sega managed to hold out just a couple of years more.
to my knowledge, Dreamcast was NOT designed to be long-living platform, and originally was planned to be replaced by upgraded version (~Naomi2 equivalent) somewhere around 2001.
if this true - there wouldn't be much more amazing titles for original Dreamcast.

Of course a VF4 port is possible.
yep, we've seen Mortal Kombat games for NES or ZX-Spectrum, so VF4 for DC doable for sure, but obviously it will require serious rework (or to be made from scratch) and result will look not as good as Naomi2 or PS2 versions.
 

Americandad

Registered
Registered
Joined
Jun 28, 2019
Messages
97
Reaction score
42
Points
18
AG User Name
Americandad
AG Join Date
July 4, 2011
result will look not as good as Naomi2 or PS2 versions.
Maybe, or maybe some clever engineering would make it look as good. At this point it's all speculation.
Also, terrible comparison comparing Mega Drive vs. Nes and PS2 vs. DC, ridiculous really. DC is way closer to PS2 compared to how far off the NES is vs. Mega Drive.

if this true - there wouldn't be much more amazing titles for original Dreamcast.
In DreamPod #77 (interview with Headhunter dev) Stefan Holmqvist states that Dreamcast was nowhere near showing off it's full potential by any released software. I tend to believe him.
 

MetalliC

Registered
Registered
Joined
Jun 28, 2019
Messages
51
Reaction score
50
Points
18
AG User Name
MetalliC
AG Join Date
23.04.2014
Maybe, or maybe some clever engineering would make it look as good. At this point it's all speculation.
not speculation but suggestion based on analysis of VF4 for Naomi2 and PS2, plus deep knowledge of how N2 and DC hardware works, what it was capable of, and what is not.

Stefan Holmqvist states that Dreamcast was nowhere near showing off it's full potential by any released software. I tend to believe him.
this is partly true - almost none of games does full and balanced load of DC hardware capabilities.
but some do this - Dead or Alive 2 is one of best examples. sorry, but DC was not capable of notable better visuals than this.
in general, DC was good for the time of its release - 1998, but was outclassed by other gaming platforms released during next few years.

also, you missed main point - there is no reason to target some new cool games for NOT flagman platform.
 

Americandad

Registered
Registered
Joined
Jun 28, 2019
Messages
97
Reaction score
42
Points
18
AG User Name
Americandad
AG Join Date
July 4, 2011
NOT flagman platform.
Assuming your hypothesis about Dreamcast 2 is true, at this point you're the only one who has spoken about this though.
not speculation but suggestion based on analysis of VF4 for Naomi2 and PS2, plus deep knowledge of how N2 and DC hardware works, what it was capable of, and what is not.
There's a difference in something looking the same and being the same. Meaning: you can make a port of a game look just as good on the screen while technically being inferior. That's where clever engineering comes in.
 

MetalliC

Registered
Registered
Joined
Jun 28, 2019
Messages
51
Reaction score
50
Points
18
AG User Name
MetalliC
AG Join Date
23.04.2014
at this point you're the only one who has spoken about this though.
how do you think, what is total number of humans at this planet who understands N2 tech in all details and knows its development history ? (besides of original creators)
3
and I'm the only such person at this forum ;)

and btw, it is almost same can be said about DC, but there will be a few more persons.

There's a difference in something looking the same and being the same. Meaning: you can make a port of a game look just as good on the screen while technically being inferior. That's where clever engineering comes in.
in theory - yes, but at practice - it looks doubtful. otherwise we should have games for PS1 or N64 "looking the same" as PS2 or GC games, thanks to "clever engineering" ;)
 

Xaeroxcore

Registered
Registered
Joined
Aug 22, 2019
Messages
30
Reaction score
12
Points
8
AG User Name
xaeroxcore
AG Join Date
Oct 17, 2012
how do you think, what is total number of humans at this planet who understands N2 tech in all details and knows its development history ? (besides of original creators)
3
and I'm the only such person at this forum ;)

and btw, it is almost same can be said about DC, but there will be a few more persons.


in theory - yes, but at practice - it looks doubtful. otherwise we should have games for PS1 or N64 "looking the same" as PS2 or GC games, thanks to "clever engineering" ;)
But you forget DC is one entire gen ahead of PS1and n64, so, in theory it could be easier to make DC games to look like PS2 or GC than 32bit/64 bits games...In fact, most of DC to PS2 and GC ports look at least to average PS2 and GC games for the early years, so at least on the 128 bit standard.

But i´m agree with you, DOA 2 is probably the tech roof at least on 3D fighting genre, which is no less....according to beyond 3d´s polygons counts (the famous yes, but how many poligons? thread), DOA 2 characters has more geometry than PS2 VF4 characters, and yes PS2 VF 4 still retains amazing lighting, particles, reflections and post processing effects from the N2 VF4, but DOA 2 stages are multilayer and some of them are more complex than some of the PS2 VF 4. So yes, VF 4 is more advanced, but it is on the same gen of DC, so it is not out of the reach of the console. I´m not saying it would look as good as the PS2 version, which is itself a tech miracle, but i see it possible...Only real reason they did not release it, is they considered a not worthy investment for a console leaving the market.... My point is, is not a way to maybe crowdfund an independent DC development that really push the console out of it´s limits, taking advatage of more modern programming tech???
 
Last edited:

la-li-lu-le-lo

Registered
Registered
Joined
Jun 13, 2019
Messages
276
Reaction score
96
Points
28
AG User Name
la-li-lu-le-lo
AG Join Date
2-8-2006
What I think would’ve been even more interesting than DC VF4 is if they had ported the game to the GC or Xbox instead of the PS2. Either of those systems probably could’ve handled a port that was much closer to the original - look at the GC version of Beach Spikers for example, which was based on the Naomi 2 version. The Xbox’s hardware exceeded the Naomi 2 in nearly every way. I think the only reason Sega released it for the PS2 is because they wanted the system to have at least one big name game that wasn’t something like a DC port - that, and also maybe they thought it would sell better, which is probably true because it sold incredibly well.
 

Xaeroxcore

Registered
Registered
Joined
Aug 22, 2019
Messages
30
Reaction score
12
Points
8
AG User Name
xaeroxcore
AG Join Date
Oct 17, 2012
What I think would’ve been even more interesting than DC VF4 is if they had ported the game to the GC or Xbox instead of the PS2. Either of those systems probably could’ve handled a port that was much closer to the original - look at the GC version of Beach Spikers for example, which was based on the Naomi 2 version. The Xbox’s hardware exceeded the Naomi 2 in nearly every way. I think the only reason Sega released it for the PS2 is because they wanted the system to have at least one big name game that wasn’t something like a DC port - that, and also maybe they thought it would sell better, which is probably true because it sold incredibly well.
In regards to VF 4 PS2 port i´d bet that also Sony put money under the table or offered something to Sega, to keep it PS2 exclusive...Sony often does that, and i´m not judging, MS probably did the same to secure Shenmue 2 US exclusivity on Xbox, for example....It would be interesting to have VF 4 specially on GCN, as you said, probably a more faithfull VF 4 port than the PS2 we got. Anyway, PS2 port, specially Evolution, has lotta of merit, it really surpass Tekken 4 and 5 in some areas, despite being a game built for an entire different and most powerful architecture than PS2´s, unless Tekken 4 and 5, both were built around PS2 hardware. I´d put the PS2 VF4 on the same realm than the PS2 RE 4 port. Games that in theory would not even be possible on PS2, but here they are, and they are great games, considering PS2 limitations!


But DC going back to DC, it deserved a better VF than the VF 3 TB port we had. I´ve never understood why Sega did not put the money on a VF 4 on regular Naomi, instead of wasting money on Naomi 2....Naomi lasted like +10 years active and was a succesfull arcade system, while Naomi 2 how many games it has? less than 10, and was active for how many time? 4 years? with more expensive to make games....I know in theory Model 3 is superior to DC,/NAOMI 1, but compare VF3 against DOA2 and even Soul Calibur, both games STOMP Model 3 VF 3, something that proves they could have made a Naomi based VF 4 (or at least a reworked from scracth version of VF3) that would show a significant gap against everything on Model 3, and secure the damned DC port, or at least give us the last Sega console with a worthy Virtua Fighter game....
 

MetalliC

Registered
Registered
Joined
Jun 28, 2019
Messages
51
Reaction score
50
Points
18
AG User Name
MetalliC
AG Join Date
23.04.2014
But you forget DC is one entire gen ahead of PS1and n64, so, in theory it could be easier to make DC games to look like PS2 or GC than 32bit/64 bits games...In fact, most of DC to PS2 and GC ports look at least to average PS2 and GC games for the early years, so at least on the 128 bit standard.
well, yes, but if speaking in general - all these generations in console world means mostly nothing.
lets look at so called 6th gen:
  • 1998 Dreamcast - clearly DirectX 6 class system, with GPU something about RivaTNT2
  • 2000 Playstation 2 - had special VU0/VU1 vector modules, which handle T&L and not only, imo it is somewhat DirectX 7 equivalent.
  • 2001 GameCube - Flipper GPU had fixed-function T&L, plus TEV engine which may be considered early and limited pixel shaders, so it was almost like DirectX 8
  • 2002 Xbox - Nvidia NV20A had fully functional vertex and pixel shaders - DirectX 8 or even early 9 class hardware.
so, same 6th gen actually had like 3 or even 4 different classes/generations of hardware, thus imo all these "console generations" classification chart mostly bullshit.

I´ve never understood why Sega did not put the money on a VF 4 on regular Naomi, instead of wasting money on Naomi 2....
wasting money ? there was no such term in Sega Arcade division :D they often used NAOMI board as a simple I/O controller, for hopper device for example, instead of some cheap 8-bit MCU. because they dont give a f... and in general, Naomi2 was not expensive, vice versa it was quite cost effective upgrade.
Sega Hikaru - that was really waste of money :D

Naomi lasted like +10 years active and was a succesfull arcade system, while Naomi 2 how many games it has? less than 10, and was active for how many time? 4 years?
not 10+, Naomi was mainly active up to 2006. then was mostly replaced by SystemSP, which was used up to 2010 as a low cost platform.

why N2 was active like 4 years - because of VERY fast tech progress these years, especially in 3D GPU. so, it was easier and better to use common PC hardware (e.g. Lindbergh) as a flagman platform for advanced games.
while still use Naomi1/SystemSP for simple medal, cards, coin pusher etc games, because they had shitload of boards and components for them.

as of "cool" arcade games in general - games like VF4 and VF5 generated laughful proffit, nowhere near for example simple collectible cards type games (Mushiking, Dinoking etc), or horse breeding games (Derby Owners, Star Horse etc).
so, Sega focused on that type of games which generate main proffit. and that was not fighting games or other "cool" arcade genres.
 

Americandad

Registered
Registered
Joined
Jun 28, 2019
Messages
97
Reaction score
42
Points
18
AG User Name
Americandad
AG Join Date
July 4, 2011
have games for PS1 or N64 "looking the same" as PS2 or GC games
I agree with Xaeroxcore, in that DC hardware isn't really comparable to PSX/N64. But yes, of course, there's a limit to everything - including the DC and it's capabilities.

I'm not saying you can port Doom Eternal to DC.
I'm saying that a more or less true-to-arcade port of VF4 could be done.


Dreamcast was NOT designed to be long-living platform, and originally was planned to be replaced by upgraded version
how do you think, what is total number of humans at this planet who understands N2 tech in all details and knows its development history ? (besides of original creators)
undefined
Interesting. Could you possibly find the time to share your findings with us in a more in-depth manner?
 
Top